Jump to content

Translations:Cylinder Leaks/2/zh-hant: Difference between revisions

From Derail Valley
Importing existing translations
 
Nokau (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
這也意味著如果一組緊軔的列車中包含一輛使用「自動保壓司軔閥、且主風泵正常運作的動力車輛,那麼只要車輛的引擎仍在運轉,列車所有車輛軔缸的壓力將能夠保持不變不會因洩漏而失控。但若列車中僅包含一輛使用「非自動保壓司軔閥的車輛進行緊軔時,除非司軔閥手柄於緊軔位,軔缸的壓力可能會無法長久維持,導致靜止列車滑動
儘管如此,雖不建議還是有不透過手軔機讓運轉中列車安全靜止的方式。當一組列車受配有{{pll|Lapping|自動保壓}}司軔閥的動力車輛以{{pll|Train Brake|貫通}}方式緊軔只要{{pll|Compressor|風泵}}能正常運作,保持其引擎發動就能夠維持列車所有軔缸的壓力,不會因洩漏而導致失控。但若改為配有{{pll|Lapping|非自動保壓}}司軔閥的動力車輛,除非司軔閥手柄「{{pll|Lapping|緊軔}}」段位,軔缸的壓力無法維持,最終導致列車失控

Latest revision as of 08:36, 14 April 2025

Information about message (contribute)
This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.
Message definition (Cylinder Leaks)
That said, there are ways to keep running trains safely stationary without handbrakes too, even though this is not recommended. If a train with an applied {{pll|Train Brake|train brake}} contains a motorized vehicle with a {{pll|Lapping|self-lapping}} control valve and a functioning {{pll|Compressor|compressor}}, as long as the engine is running the pressure in all of the train’s brake cylinders will be maintained. This means runaways due to leaks won’t be possible. If the train, however, only contains a {{pll|Lapping|non-self-lapping}} vehicle doing the braking, pressure in the cylinders will not be maintained and can lead to a runaway, unless the brake handle is in the {{pll|Lapping|service}} position.

儘管如此,雖不建議,還是有不透過手軔機讓運轉中列車安全靜止的方式。當一組列車受配有自動保壓 司軔閥的動力車輛以貫通 方式緊軔,則只要它的風泵 能正常運作,保持其引擎發動就能夠維持列車上所有軔缸內的壓力,不會因洩漏而導致失控。但若改為配有非自動保壓 司軔閥的動力車輛,除非司軔閥手柄設於「緊軔 」段位,軔缸內的壓力將無法維持,最終導致列車失控。